carnal0wnage [Shared Reader]

Wednesday, May 5, 2010

Metasploit Lotus Domino Version Scanner

I pushed out the first of a few Lotus Domino modules I've been working on to the metasploit trunk last nite.

The first one is a Lotus Domino Version Module.

There is no real "banner grabbing" for versions with Lotus Domino, old old versions "may" display the version in the server headers but I've never seen anything above 5.x do this. You usually get something like:

HTTP/1.0 200 OK
Server: Lotus-Domino
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 00:19:11 GMT
Last-Modified: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 01:39:54 GMT
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Length: 5390
Cache-control: private
ETag: W/"MTAtODA4NS1DMTI1NzZENjAwMTVGRDhELTAtMA=="


for headers.

Useful enough to identify that its a Domino web server but not so much for using the couple of remote exploits out there that are very version and/or fixpack dependent.

There are a couple of files that the web server may serve up that have version information.

The first being iNotes/FormsX.nsf that usually has the version information as a comment in the html (this can be turned off) and the second being download/filesets/l_LOTUS_SCRIPT.inf
type files that has the base install version (at least as far as I can tell its the base install). *If thats not right please let me know*

So let's give it a test drive...

msf > use auxiliary/scanner/lotus/lotus_domino_version
msf auxiliary(lotus_domino_version) > info

Name: Lotus Domino Version
Version: $Revision$
License: Metasploit Framework License (BSD)
Rank: Normal

Provided by:
CG

Basic options:
Name Current Setting Required Description
---- --------------- -------- -----------
PATH / yes path
Proxies no Use a proxy chain
RHOSTS yes The target address range or CIDR identifier
RPORT 80 yes The target port
THREADS 1 yes The number of concurrent threads
VHOST no HTTP server virtual host

Description:
Checks to determine Lotus Domino Server Version.

msf auxiliary(lotus_domino_version) > set RHOSTS file:/home/user/shodan-domino.txt
RHOSTS => file:/home/user/shodan-domino.txt
msf auxiliary(lotus_domino_version) > run

[*] 192.168.245.101:80 Lotus Domino Current Version: 6.5.4 (Windows NT/Intel)
[*] 192.168.245.101:80 Lotus Domino Base Install Version: 6.0.5.50
[*] 192.168.245.101:80 Lotus Domino Base Install Version: 6.0.5.50
[*] 192.168.245.101:80 Lotus Domino Base Install Version: 6.0.5.50
[*] 192.168.245.101:80 Lotus Domino Base Install Version: 6.0.5.50
[*] 192.168.80.132:80 Lotus Domino Current Version: 6.5.5 (Solaris Sparc)
[*] 192.168.80.132:80 Lotus Domino Base Install Version: 6.0.4
[*] 192.168.80.132:80 Lotus Domino Base Install Version: 6.0.4
[-] no response for 192.168.80.132:80 download/filesets/l_SEARCH.inf
[*] 192.168.80.132:80 Lotus Domino Base Install Version: 6.0.4
[*] Scanned 02 of 20 hosts (010% complete)
[*] 192.168.220.33:80 Lotus Domino Current Version: 8.0.2 HF1190 (Windows NT/Intel)
[*] 192.168.220.33:80 Lotus Domino Current Version: 8.0.2 HF1190 (Windows NT/Intel)
[*] 192.168.220.33:80 Lotus Domino Base Install Version: 8.0.1.0
[*] 192.168.220.33:80 Lotus Domino Base Install Version: 8.0.1.0
[*] 192.168.220.33:80 Lotus Domino Base Install Version: 8.0.1.0
[*] 192.168.220.33:80 Lotus Domino Base Install Version: 8.0.1.0
[-] 192.168.152.68:80 302 Redirect to https://192.168.152.68/iNotes/Forms5.nsf
[-] 192.168.152.68:80 302 Redirect to https://192.168.152.68/iNotes/Forms6.nsf
[-] 192.168.152.68:80 302 Redirect to https://192.168.152.68/iNotes/Forms7.nsf
[-] 192.168.152.68:80 302 Redirect to https://192.168.152.68/download/filesets/l_LOTUS_SCRIPT.inf
[-] 192.168.152.68:80 302 Redirect to https://192.168.152.68/download/filesets/n_LOTUS_SCRIPT.inf
[-] 192.168.152.68:80 302 Redirect to https://192.168.152.68/download/filesets/l_SEARCH.inf
[-] 192.168.152.68:80 302 Redirect to https://192.168.152.68/download/filesets/n_SEARCH.inf
[*] Scanned 04 of 20 hosts (020% complete)
[*] 192.168.166.33:80 Lotus Domino Current Version: 7.0.1 (Windows NT/Intel)
[*] 192.168.166.33:80 Lotus Domino Current Version: 7.0.1 (Windows NT/Intel)
[*] 192.168.166.33:80 Lotus Domino Base Install Version: 7.0.1.0
[*] 192.168.166.33:80 Lotus Domino Base Install Version: 7.0.1.0
[*] 192.168.166.33:80 Lotus Domino Base Install Version: 7.0.1.0
[*] 192.168.166.33:80 Lotus Domino Base Install Version: 7.0.1.0
[*] Scanned 06 of 20 hosts (030% complete)
[*] 192.168.33.93:80 Lotus Domino Current Version: 7.0.2 (Windows NT/Intel)
[*] 192.168.33.93:80 Lotus Domino Current Version: 7.0.2 (Windows NT/Intel)
[*] 192.168.33.93:80 Lotus Domino Base Install Version: 7.0.2.0
[*] 192.168.33.93:80 Lotus Domino Base Install Version: 7.0.2.0
[*] 192.168.33.93:80 Lotus Domino Base Install Version: 7.0.2.0
[*] 192.168.33.93:80 Lotus Domino Base Install Version: 7.0.2.0
[*] 192.168.246.154:80 Lotus Domino Current Version: 7.0.3FP1 (Windows NT/Intel)
[*] 192.168.246.154:80 Lotus Domino Current Version: 7.0.3FP1 (Windows NT/Intel)
[*] 192.168.246.154:80 Lotus Domino Base Install Version: 7.0.3.0
[*] 192.168.246.154:80 Lotus Domino Base Install Version: 7.0.3.0
[*] 192.168.246.154:80 Lotus Domino Base Install Version: 7.0.3.0
[*] 192.168.246.154:80 Lotus Domino Base Install Version: 7.0.3.0
...

5 comments:

Nicob said...

There're several others ways to grab Domino versions. You may look for /help/help_[digits].nsf (inurl:.nsf intitle:domino intitle:(aide|help)) or /help/readme.nsf (inurl:/help/readme.nsf intitle:"release notes" intitle:domino).

They seem too be much more deployed than l_LOTUS_SCRIPT.inf or FormsX.nsf.

CG said...

the first one is no better than looking at homepage.nsf which gives you major version but the 2nd one is pretty good. still misses fix packs though.

i'll add in the 2nd check or you can send me a diff

CG said...

[*] x.x.x.x:80 Lotus Domino Current Version: 7.0.2FP1 (Windows NT/Intel)
[*] x.x.x.x:80 Lotus Domino Release Notes Version:7.0.2
[*] x.x.x.x:80 Lotus Domino Base Install Version: 7.0.2.0

Nicob said...

Fine ;-)

card scanner said...

God bless you! ;) was looking for this EVERYWHERE!

Can you please upload some more ways to grab domino versions? this one worked for me but when I tried it on a different laptop it didn't..